UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus M/S ORIENT ENTERPRISES ETC.
At the relevant time, there was no statutory right entitling payment of interest on delayed refund. The writ petition for interest was not for enforcement of a legal right under the statute and thus cannot be maintained under Article 226.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India and Ors.; Respondent: M/s Orient Enterprises; Respondent: Elephanta Oil Vanaspati Industries (formerly M/s Jain Sudh Vanaspati Ltd.)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed. Impugned judgments of the High Court set aside. Writ petitions dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Delayed Refund, Maintainability of Writ Petition, Statutory Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India and Ors.
Appellant
M/s Orient Enterprises
Respondent
Elephanta Oil Vanaspati Industries (formerly M/s Jain Sudh Vanaspati Ltd.)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking relief of payment of interest on delayed refund amount under the Customs Act, 1962 is maintainable.
Ratio Decidendi
At the relevant time, there was no statutory right entitling payment of interest on delayed refund. The writ petition for interest was not for enforcement of a legal right under the statute and thus cannot be maintained under Article 226.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed. Impugned judgments of the High Court set aside. Writ petitions dismissed.
Orders
- The impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside.
- Writ petitions filed by respondents are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment