UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus PRADIP KUMAR DEY
In the absence of material relating to qualifications, method of recruitment, degree of skill, experience, responsibilities, and other relevant factors for comparison, mere recommendations do not confer a right to claim higher pay-scales under 'equal pay for equal work'; court intervention is unwarranted unless there is proven hostile discrimination.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India and Ors.; Respondent: Pradip Kumar Dey
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Calcutta High Court
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay for Equal Work, Pay Scales, Writ of Mandamus
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India and Ors.
Appellant
Pradip Kumar Dey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Calcutta High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether mere recommendation by CRPF Directorate to Pay Commission confers a right to seek a writ of mandamus for higher pay-scale.
- 2 Whether the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' applies to Radio Operators in CRPF vis-à-vis those in other government agencies without material for comparison.
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of material relating to qualifications, method of recruitment, degree of skill, experience, responsibilities, and other relevant factors for comparison, mere recommendations do not confer a right to claim higher pay-scales under 'equal pay for equal work'; court intervention is unwarranted unless there is proven hostile discrimination.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment and order of Division Bench set aside.
- Judgment of Single Judge restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment