ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE ETC. versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHER

ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE ETC. versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHER

The distribution of promotion quota for Group 'B' feeder cadres to Group 'A' in the ratio of 6:1:2 among Central Excise Superintendents, Customs (P) Superintendents, and Customs Appraisers respectively is fair, just, and equitable. The 50:50 quota between direct recruits and promotees in Group 'A' service must be preserved, with corresponding amendments directed for the 1987 Rules and seniority lists to reflect this structure.

Parties
Petitioner: All India Federation of Central Excise Etc.; Respondent: Union of India and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
22 November 1996
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment/order
Outcome
Writ Petitions disposed of with direction to amend 1987 Rules and seniority lists as per the accepted proposal and modifications indicated in the judgment; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Promotion, Seniority, Constitutionality of Service Rules
Service Law Promotion Seniority Constitutionality of Service Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

All India Federation of Central Excise Etc.

Petitioner

Union of India and Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment/order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Constitutional validity of Rule 18(2) of Indian Customs and Central Excise Service Group 'A' Rules, 1987
  2. 2 Distribution of promotee quota among various Group 'B' feeder cadres for promotion to Group 'A'
  3. 3 Maintenance of 50:50 quota between direct recruits and promotees in Group 'A' service

Ratio Decidendi

The distribution of promotion quota for Group 'B' feeder cadres to Group 'A' in the ratio of 6:1:2 among Central Excise Superintendents, Customs (P) Superintendents, and Customs Appraisers respectively is fair, just, and equitable. The 50:50 quota between direct recruits and promotees in Group 'A' service must be preserved, with corresponding amendments directed for the 1987 Rules and seniority lists to reflect this structure.

Court Disposition

Writ Petitions disposed of with direction to amend 1987 Rules and seniority lists as per the accepted proposal and modifications indicated in the judgment; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Union of India directed to amend the Indian Customs and Central Excise Service Group 'A' Rules, 1987, specifically concerning Group 'A' service, reflecting the promotion quota ratio of 6:1:2.
  • Review and regularisation of all post-1979 ad hoc promotions to the posts of Senior Superintendent/Assistant Collector in the promotee quota in light of the judgment.