UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus DR. DEVENDRA VIR SAHI
The respondent, appointed after 1.10.1984, is not entitled to regularisation on the sole basis of Confidential Reports as per Dr. A.K. Jain's case. Regularisation for such appointments depends on a full screening process by the Union Public Service Commission, and, having been found unfit, the respondent's...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India and Others; Respondent: Dr. Devendra Vir Sahi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Central Administrative Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Railways, Ad Hoc Appointments, Regularisation, Assistant Medical Officers, Screening by Union Public Service Commission
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India and Others
Appellant
Dr. Devendra Vir Sahi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Central Administrative Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent is entitled to regularisation solely on the basis of Confidential Reports as per Dr. A.K. Jain's case or must undergo full evaluation by the Union Public Service Commission for appointments after 1.10.1984.
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent, appointed after 1.10.1984, is not entitled to regularisation on the sole basis of Confidential Reports as per Dr. A.K. Jain's case. Regularisation for such appointments depends on a full screening process by the Union Public Service Commission, and, having been found unfit, the respondent's termination was justified.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench is set aside.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment