EXTRA JUDICIAL EXECUTION VICTIM FAMILIES ASSOCIATION (EEVFAM) & ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Writ petition maintainable under Article 32 for gross human rights violations by state actors; allegations of extra-judicial executions must be enquired into by judicial or independent agencies; excessive or retaliatory force by state agencies is impermissible; the Constitution permits deployment of armed forces as aid to civil power but not as replacement; proceedings against alleged offenders in security forces may be instituted in criminal court subject to requisite procedure; effective inquiry mechanisms and remedies for victims are essential.
- Parties
- Petitioner: EXTRA JUDICIAL EXECUTION VICTIM FAMILIES ASSOCIATION (EEVFAM) & ANR.; Respondent: UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (criminal) No.129 of 2012 / Listed for Further Proceedings After Interim Orders and Directions
- Outcome
- Interim directions issued; writ petition maintainable; matter listed for further proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Maintainability of Writ Under Article 32, Extra Judicial Executions, Armed Forces (special Powers) Act, Use of Excessive Force by Security Forces, Duty of Union Government Under Article 355, Emergency Powers Under Articles 352 and 356, NHRC Guidelines and Effectiveness, Distinction Between Public Order and Internal Disturbance, Jurisdiction Over Trial of Armed Forces Personnel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EXTRA JUDICIAL EXECUTION VICTIM FAMILIES ASSOCIATION (EEVFAM) & ANR.
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) No.129 of 2012 / Listed for Further Proceedings After Interim Orders and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether writ petition alleging extra-judicial executions and gross human rights violations is maintainable under Article 32 of the Constitution
- 2 Whether allegations of use of excessive force by security forces in Manipur require judicial or independent inquiry
- 3 What is the scope of deployment of armed forces under the Constitution, especially under AFSPA
Ratio Decidendi
Writ petition maintainable under Article 32 for gross human rights violations by state actors; allegations of extra-judicial executions must be enquired into by judicial or independent agencies; excessive or retaliatory force by state agencies is impermissible; the Constitution permits deployment of armed forces as aid to civil power but not as replacement; proceedings against alleged offenders in security forces may be instituted in criminal court subject to requisite procedure; effective inquiry mechanisms and remedies for victims are essential.
Court Disposition
Interim directions issued; writ petition maintainable; matter listed for further proceedings.
Orders
- Directed representative of petitioners and Amicus to prepare tabular statement for 62 documented cases indicating details of inquiry and complaints filed; identical exercise for remaining cases agreed.
- Requested NHRC to assist Amicus and representative in compiling information for all cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment