CHARAN LAL SAHU ETC. ETC. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of claims) Act, 1985 is constitutionally valid. The Central Government may act as parens patriae for victims due to their disability in litigating against multinational corporations. The special procedure and settlement, though without notice, is justified by circumstances and approved by the Supreme Court. Principles of natural justice are not fully breached given opportunities for victims to be heard in ongoing proceedings. The statutory differentiation of victims satisfies Article 14. The Act is not invalid due to potential misuse if its operative provisions are reasonable.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Charan Lal Sahu; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Union Carbide Corporation (UCC); Respondent: Union Carbide (India) Ltd. (UCIL)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition / Final Decision at Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Petitions disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Constitutional Validity, Natural Justice, Parens Patriae, Industrial Disaster Liability, Procedural Due Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charan Lal Sahu
Petitioner
Union of India
Respondent
Union Carbide Corporation (UCC)
Respondent
Union Carbide (India) Ltd. (UCIL)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Final Decision at Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Constitutional validity of Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of claims) Act, 1985
- 2 Violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21
- 3 Principles of natural justice
Ratio Decidendi
The Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of claims) Act, 1985 is constitutionally valid. The Central Government may act as parens patriae for victims due to their disability in litigating against multinational corporations. The special procedure and settlement, though without notice, is justified by circumstances and approved by the Supreme Court. Principles of natural justice are not fully breached given opportunities for victims to be heard in ongoing proceedings. The statutory differentiation of victims satisfies Article 14. The Act is not invalid due to potential misuse if its operative provisions are reasonable.
Court Disposition
Petitions disposed of
Orders
- Act held constitutionally valid
- Settlement not set aside; review petition pending
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment