UNION OF INDIA ETC. versus GIANI
Respondents are not entitled to compensation under Section 23(1A) as the award was passed before 30.04.1982; delay in filing appeals is condoned due to sufficient cause.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India etc.; Respondent: Giani
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation, Condonation of Delay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Union of India etc.
Appellant
Giani
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent land-owners are entitled to compensation under Section 23(1A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
- 2 Whether delay in preferring appeals should be condoned
Ratio Decidendi
Respondents are not entitled to compensation under Section 23(1A) as the award was passed before 30.04.1982; delay in filing appeals is condoned due to sufficient cause.
Court Disposition
Appeals partly allowed
Orders
- Delay in filing appeals condoned
- Respondents not entitled to benefit of Section 23(1A)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment