FEDERATION OF BAR ASSOCIATIONS IN KARNATAKA versus UNION OF INDIA

FEDERATION OF BAR ASSOCIATIONS IN KARNATAKA versus UNION OF INDIA

There is no infringement of fundamental right by not having a High Court bench within proximal distance; thus, writ petition under Article 32 is not maintainable for establishing a bench. Establishment of benches rests with the High Court and is subject to statutory provisions; the opinions formed after committee consultation should be respected.

Parties
Petitioner: Federation of Bar Associations in Karnataka; Respondent: Union of India
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
24 July 2000
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment
Outcome
petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Maintainability of Writ Petition Under Article 32, Establishment of High Court Benches, Fundamental Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Federation of Bar Associations in Karnataka

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there is a fundamental right to have a High Court bench within proximal distance of litigants' residence
  2. 2 Whether the writ petition seeking establishment of a High Court bench is maintainable under Article 32
  3. 3 Role of Chief Justice and High Court in establishment of benches

Ratio Decidendi

There is no infringement of fundamental right by not having a High Court bench within proximal distance; thus, writ petition under Article 32 is not maintainable for establishing a bench. Establishment of benches rests with the High Court and is subject to statutory provisions; the opinions formed after committee consultation should be respected.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • Writ petition under Article 32 seeking establishment of High Court bench is dismissed.