SWARAJ ABHIYAN (V) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
States and Union Territories are constitutionally and statutorily obligated to establish and make functional Grievance Redressal Mechanisms, independent District Grievance Redressal Officers, State Food Commissions, Vigilance Committees, and social audit protocols under the National Food Security Act, 2013. The Union must actively direct and monitor compliance, and notify rules to ensure transparency and accountability in implementation. Judicial directions are necessary given persistent non-implementation after repeated prodding.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Swaraj Abhiyan; Respondent: Union of India & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment With Directions
- Outcome
- Directions issued; writ petition disposed.
- Legal Topics
- Implementation of National Food Security Act, 2013, Co Operative Federalism, Grievance Redressal Mechanisms, Social Audit, Vigilance Committees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Swaraj Abhiyan
Petitioner
Union of India & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment With Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the National Food Security Act, 2013 is being faithfully implemented by States and Union Territories
- 2 What constitutional measures can the Union take to require compliance from States and Union Territories under social welfare legislations
- 3 What remedies exist for citizens and the Union when State Governments do not implement mandatory provisions of Parliament-enacted laws
Ratio Decidendi
States and Union Territories are constitutionally and statutorily obligated to establish and make functional Grievance Redressal Mechanisms, independent District Grievance Redressal Officers, State Food Commissions, Vigilance Committees, and social audit protocols under the National Food Security Act, 2013. The Union must actively direct and monitor compliance, and notify rules to ensure transparency and accountability in implementation. Judicial directions are necessary given persistent non-implementation after repeated prodding.
Court Disposition
Directions issued; writ petition disposed.
Orders
- Union Secretary to convene meetings with State/UT counterparts and take stock of NFS Act implementation.
- Union to request and commend States/UTs to notify appropriate Grievance Redressal Mechanism rules and designate independent District Grievance Redressal Officers within fixed timeframe (before year-end).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment