SWARAJ ABHIYAN (V) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

SWARAJ ABHIYAN (V) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

States and Union Territories are constitutionally and statutorily obligated to establish and make functional Grievance Redressal Mechanisms, independent District Grievance Redressal Officers, State Food Commissions, Vigilance Committees, and social audit protocols under the National Food Security Act, 2013. The Union must actively direct and monitor compliance, and notify rules to ensure transparency and accountability in implementation. Judicial directions are necessary given persistent non-implementation after repeated prodding.

Parties
Petitioner: Swaraj Abhiyan; Respondent: Union of India & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
21 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment With Directions
Outcome
Directions issued; writ petition disposed.
Legal Topics
Implementation of National Food Security Act, 2013, Co Operative Federalism, Grievance Redressal Mechanisms, Social Audit, Vigilance Committees

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Swaraj Abhiyan

Petitioner

Union of India & Ors.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment With Directions

  1. 1 Whether the National Food Security Act, 2013 is being faithfully implemented by States and Union Territories
  2. 2 What constitutional measures can the Union take to require compliance from States and Union Territories under social welfare legislations
  3. 3 What remedies exist for citizens and the Union when State Governments do not implement mandatory provisions of Parliament-enacted laws

Ratio Decidendi

States and Union Territories are constitutionally and statutorily obligated to establish and make functional Grievance Redressal Mechanisms, independent District Grievance Redressal Officers, State Food Commissions, Vigilance Committees, and social audit protocols under the National Food Security Act, 2013. The Union must actively direct and monitor compliance, and notify rules to ensure transparency and accountability in implementation. Judicial directions are necessary given persistent non-implementation after repeated prodding.

Court Disposition

Directions issued; writ petition disposed.

Orders

  • Union Secretary to convene meetings with State/UT counterparts and take stock of NFS Act implementation.
  • Union to request and commend States/UTs to notify appropriate Grievance Redressal Mechanism rules and designate independent District Grievance Redressal Officers within fixed timeframe (before year-end).