PALLAVI versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The petitioner held an OCI registration issued prior to 04.03.2021 (02.11.2015) and, following this Court’s ruling in Anushka Rengunthwar, the MHA notification dated 04.03.2021 could not be applied so as to withdraw accrued rights of such OCI cardholders; AIIMS’ change of the petitioner’s status and rejection of her candidature was not supportable in law, and she must be considered in remaining counselling rounds for PG medical seats along with other similarly placed OCI cardholders issued prior to 04.03.2021.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Pallavi; Respondent: Union of India & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) No. 642 of 2023 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Judgment Allowing Writ Petition (01.09.2023)
- Outcome
- Writ petition allowed
- Legal Topics
- OCI Cardholders, Neet/pg Medical Admissions, Validity and Retrospective Effect of MHA Notification Dated 04.03.2021, Section 7 B of the Citizenship Act, 1955, Parity With Nris and Indian Nationals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pallavi
Petitioner
Union of India & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) No. 642 of 2023 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Judgment Allowing Writ Petition (01.09.2023)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner, an OCI cardholder issued an OCI registration prior to 04.03.2021, could be denied the benefit of OCI status for NEET/PG counselling by application of the MHA notification dated 04.03.2021
- 2 Whether the MHA notification dated 04.03.2021 could be given retrospective effect to withdraw accrued rights of OCI cardholders issued prior to that date
- 3 Whether AIIMS was justified in changing the petitioner’s status from OCI/Foreign National to Indian National and rejecting her candidature
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioner held an OCI registration issued prior to 04.03.2021 (02.11.2015) and, following this Court’s ruling in Anushka Rengunthwar, the MHA notification dated 04.03.2021 could not be applied so as to withdraw accrued rights of such OCI cardholders; AIIMS’ change of the petitioner’s status and rejection of her candidature was not supportable in law, and she must be considered in remaining counselling rounds for PG medical seats along with other similarly placed OCI cardholders issued prior to 04.03.2021.
Court Disposition
Writ petition allowed
Orders
- Petitioner to be considered in remaining counselling rounds by AIIMS and all participating institutions for PG medical seats
- Consideration to include seats unfilled on date of judgment, including seats reserved for SC/ST/OBC or other categories and specially earmarked seats if they can be filled by the petitioner
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment