ALL INDIA HAJ UMRAH TOUR ORGANIZER ASSOCIATION MUMBAI versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Services supplied by HGOs/PTOs to Haj pilgrims are taxable because under the Place of Provision Rules and IGST Act the place of provision is the recipients' usual place of residence in India; exemptions in the Mega Exemption Notification do not extend to HGOs (clause 5(b) covers conduct of religious ceremonies and clause 5A is limited to specified statutory organisations), and treating Haj Committees as a separate class is a constitutionally valid classification based on intelligible differentia and rational nexus.
- Parties
- Petitioner: All India Haj Umrah Tour Organizer Association, Mumbai; Respondent: Union of India & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (c) / Final Judgment Delivered by Supreme Court (dismissal)
- Outcome
- Writ petitions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012, Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Mega Exemption Notification No.25 of 2012, Haj Committee Act, 2002, Article 14 (equality)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
All India Haj Umrah Tour Organizer Association, Mumbai
Petitioner
Union of India & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (c) / Final Judgment Delivered by Supreme Court (dismissal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether services rendered by Haj Group Organizers/Private Tour Operators to Haj pilgrims are taxable as provided or agreed to be provided in the taxable territory
- 2 Whether exemptions in Mega Exemption Notification (clause 5(b) and 5A) apply to HGOs/PTOs
- 3 Whether classification exempting Haj Committees but not HGOs breaches Article 14
Ratio Decidendi
Services supplied by HGOs/PTOs to Haj pilgrims are taxable because under the Place of Provision Rules and IGST Act the place of provision is the recipients' usual place of residence in India; exemptions in the Mega Exemption Notification do not extend to HGOs (clause 5(b) covers conduct of religious ceremonies and clause 5A is limited to specified statutory organisations), and treating Haj Committees as a separate class is a constitutionally valid classification based on intelligible differentia and rational nexus.
Court Disposition
Writ petitions dismissed
Orders
- Writ petitions dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment