SMT. ANGOORI DEVI FOR RAM RATAN versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The isolated criminal act of two police personnel did not possess the sinister significance or widespread impact required to disturb the 'public order' as contemplated by the National Security Act. Hence, the orders of preventive detention were without legal justification and must be quashed.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Smt. Angoori Devi for Ram Ratan; Respondent: Union of India & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (criminal) Nos. 353 and 491 of 1988 / Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction, Article 32 Hearings
- Outcome
- Orders of detention quashed; rule made absolute; detenu Ram Ratan and Hawa Singh to be set at liberty forthwith.
- Legal Topics
- Preventive Detention, National Security Act, Distinction Between Public Order and Law and Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Smt. Angoori Devi for Ram Ratan
Petitioner
Union of India & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) Nos. 353 and 491 of 1988 / Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction, Article 32 Hearings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the detention under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 for a single criminal act by police personnel pertained to 'public order' or merely 'law and order'.
- 2 Whether the standards of preventive detention are different for police personnel.
Ratio Decidendi
The isolated criminal act of two police personnel did not possess the sinister significance or widespread impact required to disturb the 'public order' as contemplated by the National Security Act. Hence, the orders of preventive detention were without legal justification and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Orders of detention quashed; rule made absolute; detenu Ram Ratan and Hawa Singh to be set at liberty forthwith.
Orders
- Orders of detention impugned in these cases are quashed.
- Detenu Ram Ratan and Hawa Singh be set at liberty forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment