DR. A.K. JAIN & ORS. ETC. ETC. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Ad hoc Assistant Medical Officers/Assistant Divisional Medical Officers appointed upto 1.10.1984 shall be regularised following UPSC evaluation; those appointed after 1.10.1984 not regularised but eligible for age relaxation, salary parity, and certain protections against replacement by new ad hoc appointments.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Dr. A.K. Jain & Ors.; Respondent: Union of India & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) / Final Disposition
- Outcome
- Petitions disposed of with directions issued as per order.
- Legal Topics
- Regularisation of Ad Hoc Appointments, Age Relaxation, Termination and Seniority, Railway Medical Services Recruitment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr. A.K. Jain & Ors.
Petitioner
Union of India & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether services of ad hoc Assistant Medical Officers/Assistant Divisional Medical Officers could be regularised.
- 2 If termination of ad hoc appointees in favor of UPSC-selected officers is valid.
- 3 Entitlement to age relaxation for ad hoc doctors applying to UPSC.
Ratio Decidendi
Ad hoc Assistant Medical Officers/Assistant Divisional Medical Officers appointed upto 1.10.1984 shall be regularised following UPSC evaluation; those appointed after 1.10.1984 not regularised but eligible for age relaxation, salary parity, and certain protections against replacement by new ad hoc appointments.
Court Disposition
Petitions disposed of with directions issued as per order.
Orders
- All ad hoc doctors appointed upto 1.10.1984 to be regularised after UPSC evaluation; continuity without break but no back wages.
- Petitions of officers appointed after 1.10.1984 dismissed; UPSC-selected officers to be posted to vacant posts, or posts held by ad hoc doctors, following 'last come, first go' principle.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment