BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLAN versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The POCSO Rules, 2020 create a legal entitlement to a support person whose role includes accompanying and assisting the child through investigation, medical examination, recording of statements, depositions and court proceedings, providing information and psychosocial support, and monitoring; the State must operationalise this entitlement by framing state-level rules/guidelines under Section 39, empanelling and training support persons, instituting reporting and monitoring mechanisms, and ensuring adequate remuneration; specific directions were issued to the State of Uttar Pradesh and to NCPCR/Union to ensure compliance and reporting.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Bachpan Bachao Andolan; Respondent: Union of India & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) No. 427 of 2022 Under Article 32 / Judgment Dated 18.08.2023
- Outcome
- Directions issued to State of Uttar Pradesh, NCPCR and Union for implementation, monitoring and reporting regarding support persons under POCSO Rules, 2020
- Legal Topics
- Support Person Under POCSO Rules, 2020, Implementation and Monitoring of Rules, Entitlements Under Form a, Training, Empanelment and Remuneration of Support Persons, State Level Guidelines Under Section 39 of POCSO Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bachpan Bachao Andolan
Petitioner
Union of India & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) No. 427 of 2022 Under Article 32 / Judgment Dated 18.08.2023
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the role and responsibility of a 'support person' under the POCSO Rules, 2020?
- 2 Whether the State is required to frame rules/guidelines and ensure implementation, training, empanelment and remuneration for support persons as envisaged under POCSO Rules and Section 39 of the Act
- 3 Mechanisms for monitoring implementation of POCSO Rules including reporting by CWCs and SCPCR/NCPCR
Ratio Decidendi
The POCSO Rules, 2020 create a legal entitlement to a support person whose role includes accompanying and assisting the child through investigation, medical examination, recording of statements, depositions and court proceedings, providing information and psychosocial support, and monitoring; the State must operationalise this entitlement by framing state-level rules/guidelines under Section 39, empanelling and training support persons, instituting reporting and monitoring mechanisms, and ensuring adequate remuneration; specific directions were issued to the State of Uttar Pradesh and to NCPCR/Union to ensure compliance and reporting.
Court Disposition
Directions issued to State of Uttar Pradesh, NCPCR and Union for implementation, monitoring and reporting regarding support persons under POCSO Rules, 2020
Orders
- Principal Secretary, Department of Women and Child Welfare, Uttar Pradesh to convene a meeting within six weeks to review facts and frame rules/guidelines regarding support persons, including selection, appointment, empanelment, training, career advancement and terms and conditions of employment as required under...
- Require presence at the meeting of Chairperson SCPCR, Secretary State Legal Services Authority, senior-most President of a JJB, senior-most Chairperson of a CWC in the state, and a representative from the State Commission for Women.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment