UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus G RAMESH
Once a candidate has been selected and appointed, the Select List is exhausted and a subsequent dismissal of the appointed candidate does not revive the Select List or entitle the next candidate in merit to appointment; accordingly the respondent was not entitled to appointment and his Original Application is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India & Ors; Respondent: G Ramesh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 8 February 2018
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Appointment, Select List, Departmental Enquiry, Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India & Ors
Appellant
G Ramesh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 8 February 2018
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was entitled to appointment following dismissal of the selected appointee
- 2 Whether the Select List is revived by subsequent dismissal of the appointed candidate
- 3 Whether an appointment obtained by fraudulent means is void ab initio and gives right to next candidate in merit list
Ratio Decidendi
Once a candidate has been selected and appointed, the Select List is exhausted and a subsequent dismissal of the appointed candidate does not revive the Select List or entitle the next candidate in merit to appointment; accordingly the respondent was not entitled to appointment and his Original Application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment and order of the High Court dated 8 February 2018 is set aside
- Original Application filed by the respondent seeking appointment to the post of postman is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment