UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus M/S. HAMDARD (WAQF) LABORATORIES
The adjudicatory process for refund must conclude within three months; the liability for interest under Section 11-BB commences from expiry of three months from the date of receipt of application for refund. In this case there was delay, so assessee is entitled to interest.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India & Ors.; Respondent: M/s. Hamdard (Waqf) Laboratories
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Delayed Refunds, Refund Procedure, Excise Classification
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India & Ors.
Appellant
M/s. Hamdard (Waqf) Laboratories
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interest under Section 11-BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 is payable for delay in refund of duty after three months from date of refund application.
- 2 Whether the liability to pay interest commences from the expiry of three months from the date of application or from the date of removal of defects.
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicatory process for refund must conclude within three months; the liability for interest under Section 11-BB commences from expiry of three months from the date of receipt of application for refund. In this case there was delay, so assessee is entitled to interest.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- High Court order affirmed directing revenue to pay interest under Section 11-BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 from 26 November 1999 to 15 November 2000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment