TARA PRASAD SINGH ETC. ETC. versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

TARA PRASAD SINGH ETC. ETC. versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

The Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 67 of 1976, is within Parliament's legislative competence under Entry 54 List I, serves public purpose, and does not constitute acquisition of property but extinguishment of lessees' rights; thus, the Act is protected under Article 31A(1)(e) and is not void as inconsistent with Articles 14, 19, or 31.

Parties
Petitioner: Tara Prasad Singh; Respondent: Union of India & Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
07 May 1980
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Final Judgment
Outcome
Writ petitions dismissed except for specified composite lease petitions partly allowed.
Legal Topics
Legislative Competence, Nationalisation, Coal Mines, Constitutional Validity, Acquisition and Extinguishment of Property Rights
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Mineral Law Legislative Competence Nationalisation Coal Mines Constitutional Validity Acquisition and Extinguishment of Property Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tara Prasad Singh

Petitioner

Union of India & Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Parliament had legislative competence to enact Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 67 of 1976
  2. 2 Whether the Act is violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(f), 19(1)(g), and 31 of the Constitution of India
  3. 3 Applicability of the Act to composite leases involving both coal and fireclay

Ratio Decidendi

The Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 67 of 1976, is within Parliament's legislative competence under Entry 54 List I, serves public purpose, and does not constitute acquisition of property but extinguishment of lessees' rights; thus, the Act is protected under Article 31A(1)(e) and is not void as inconsistent with Articles 14, 19, or 31.

Court Disposition

Writ petitions dismissed except for specified composite lease petitions partly allowed.

Orders

  • Stay orders vacated except in specified writ petitions concerning composite leases for coal and fireclay.
  • For enumerated writ petitions (Nos. 257, 220, 111, 600, 1130-1134, 352, 221, 178/77), mining of fireclay permitted for duration of unexpired lease so long as no coal mining occurs.