S. K. GHOSH AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Revision of seniority in the grade of Directors by the order dated 17th January 1966 was not based on any rule or applicable principle, was arbitrary, and violated Article 16; such revision must be struck down.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Petitioner: S. K. Ghosh; Petitioner: A. M. Narula; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Director-General of Posts and Telegraphs; Respondent: K. Ramamurti; Respondent: N. C. Talukdar; Respondent: Shiv Nath; Respondent: S. L. Rajan; Respondent: B. N. Dubey
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 1968
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed
- Legal Topics
- Seniority, Promotion, Arbitrariness, Article 16, Postal Service Recruitment, Selection on Merit
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. K. Ghosh
Petitioner
A. M. Narula
Petitioner
Union of India
Respondent
Director-General of Posts and Telegraphs
Respondent
K. Ramamurti
Respondent
N. C. Talukdar
Respondent
Shiv Nath
Respondent
S. L. Rajan
Respondent
B. N. Dubey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether revision of seniority in grade of Directors of Postal Services based on time scale seniority violates Article 16 of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether government orders altering seniority in the grade of Directors were arbitrary and without basis in rules.
Ratio Decidendi
Revision of seniority in the grade of Directors by the order dated 17th January 1966 was not based on any rule or applicable principle, was arbitrary, and violated Article 16; such revision must be struck down.
Court Disposition
petition allowed
Orders
- Order dated 17th January 1966 revising seniority in the grade of Directors of Postal Services quashed.
- Petitioners to receive their costs from respondent No. 1.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment