UNION OF INDIA versus B.V. SAROJA AND ANR.
Respondents are not entitled to payment of the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act as amended by Amendment Act 68/84, if the award was made prior to the amendment, as held by the Constitution Bench.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India; Respondent: B.V. Saroja; Respondent: B.V. Saroja and Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Review Petition (civil Appeal) / Supreme Court Appellate Decision on Review From Karnataka High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Entitlement to Additional Amount Under Section 23(1 A) of Land Acquisition Act as Amended by Amendment Act 68/84, Review of High Court Judgment in Light of Constitution Bench Decision
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Appellant
B.V. Saroja
Respondent
B.V. Saroja and Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Petition (civil Appeal) / Supreme Court Appellate Decision on Review From Karnataka High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants are entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as amended by Amendment Act 68/84 if the award was made prior to the commencement of the Amendment Act
Ratio Decidendi
Respondents are not entitled to payment of the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act as amended by Amendment Act 68/84, if the award was made prior to the amendment, as held by the Constitution Bench.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Review Petition ordered
- Appeal allowed to the above extent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment