UNION OF INDIA versus H. S. DHILLON
The Wealth Tax Act, as amended to include agricultural land, does not fall within Entry 49, List II, but is valid under Entry 97, List I, read with Article 248 of the Constitution since it is not expressly allotted to the State Legislature. Parliament has exclusive power to legislate on the subject by virtue of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India; Respondent: H. S. Dhillon
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 1971
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Legislative Competence, Distribution of Legislative Powers, Residuary Powers, Wealth Tax, Taxation of Agricultural Land
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Appellant
H. S. Dhillon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Parliament is competent to enact Wealth Tax on agricultural land under the Wealth Tax Act, as amended by s.24, Finance Act, 1969
- 2 Whether such tax falls under Entry 49, List II, or under Entry 97, List I, and Article 248 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The Wealth Tax Act, as amended to include agricultural land, does not fall within Entry 49, List II, but is valid under Entry 97, List I, read with Article 248 of the Constitution since it is not expressly allotted to the State Legislature. Parliament has exclusive power to legislate on the subject by virtue of the residuary powers and the impugned amendment is constitutionally valid.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- High Court judgment set aside
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment