UNION OF INDIA versus MOHD. SADIQ RATHER
The Designated Court must peruse the charge-sheet/police report and supporting documents before deciding bail under TADA Act; failure to do so invalidates the bail order.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India; Respondent: Mohd. Sadiq Rather
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Bail Order From Designated Court Under TADA Act
- Outcome
- Bail order set aside; matter remitted to Designated Court to consider bail afresh.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Under TADA Act, Override of Criminal Procedure Code, Police Report Relevance in Bail Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Union of India
Appellant
Mohd. Sadiq Rather
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Bail Order From Designated Court Under TADA Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Designated Court properly released the accused on bail without perusing the charge-sheet/police report under TADA Act
- 2 Whether provisions of TADA Act override the Criminal Procedure Code and Evidence Act for bail applications
Ratio Decidendi
The Designated Court must peruse the charge-sheet/police report and supporting documents before deciding bail under TADA Act; failure to do so invalidates the bail order.
Court Disposition
Bail order set aside; matter remitted to Designated Court to consider bail afresh.
Orders
- Respondent shall surrender within three weeks before the Designated Court.
- Designated Court to dispose of bail application afresh after perusal of charge-sheet, police report, and supporting documents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment