UNION OF INDIA & ANR. versus MOHIT MINERAL PVT. LTD.
The Compensation to States Act, 2017, is within the legislative competence of Parliament, validly enacted under express and residuary constitutional powers, including those introduced by the 101st Constitutional Amendment. The Act does not violate the Constitution nor is it colourable legislation, as it is intended to compensate States for revenue loss arising from GST implementation. The simultaneous levy of GST and Compensation Cess on the same taxing event is permissible as these are separate imposts on different aspects. There is no statutory basis for allowing set off of Clean Energy Cess already paid against Compensation Cess liability, as both levies serve different purposes.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India; Respondent: Mohit Mineral Pvt. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision and Transferred Cases; Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed, writ petition and transferred case dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Legislative Competence, Goods and Services Tax (gst), Compensation to States Act, 2017, Cess and Double Taxation, Set Off/credit for Clean Energy Cess
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Appellant
Mohit Mineral Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision and Transferred Cases; Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 is constitutionally valid and within the legislative competence of Parliament
- 2 Whether the Compensation to States Act, 2017 violates the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 or is a colourable legislation
- 3 Whether the levy of Compensation to States Cess and GST on the same taxing event is permissible in law
Ratio Decidendi
The Compensation to States Act, 2017, is within the legislative competence of Parliament, validly enacted under express and residuary constitutional powers, including those introduced by the 101st Constitutional Amendment. The Act does not violate the Constitution nor is it colourable legislation, as it is intended to compensate States for revenue loss arising from GST implementation. The simultaneous levy of GST and Compensation Cess on the same taxing event is permissible as these are separate imposts on different aspects. There is no statutory basis for allowing set off of Clean Energy Cess already paid against Compensation Cess liability, as both levies serve different purposes.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed, writ petition and transferred case dismissed.
Orders
- Writ petition dismissed.
- Transferred case dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment