UNION OF INDIA versus M/S. AMBLCA CONSTRUCTION
If contract expressly bars award of pendente lite interest, arbitrator has no power to award such interest. Bar on award of interest on delayed payment does not by itself amount to an express bar to award pendente lite interest by arbitrator.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India; Respondent: M/s. Ambica Construction
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Reference Answered by Supreme Court; Remitted to Division Bench
- Outcome
- Reference answered; if contract expressly bars pendente lite interest, it cannot be awarded by arbitrator; remitted for merits determination.
- Legal Topics
- Pendente Lite Interest, Arbitrator's Powers, Contractual Bar to Interest
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Appellant
M/s. Ambica Construction
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Reference Answered by Supreme Court; Remitted to Division Bench
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an arbitrator can award pendente lite interest when contract bars such award under Arbitration Act, 1940
Ratio Decidendi
If contract expressly bars award of pendente lite interest, arbitrator has no power to award such interest. Bar on award of interest on delayed payment does not by itself amount to an express bar to award pendente lite interest by arbitrator.
Court Disposition
Reference answered; if contract expressly bars pendente lite interest, it cannot be awarded by arbitrator; remitted for merits determination.
Orders
- Express contract bar prevents arbitrator from awarding pendente lite interest.
- Remitted to Division Bench for consideration on merits.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment