UNION OF INDIA versus OM PARKASH
The court, after appointing an arbitrator under section 8(2) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, becomes functus officio and has no jurisdiction to refer disputes to the arbitrator; any such reference is without authority and any award made on such an invalid reference is a nullity and can be set aside as 'otherwise invalid' under section 30(c) of the Act.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India; Respondent: Om Parkash
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Certificate From Allahabad High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Court's Powers Under Arbitration Act Section 8, Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Invalid Reference, Role of Court in Arbitration Appointments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Appellant
Om Parkash
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Certificate From Allahabad High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court appointing an arbitrator under section 8(2) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, can further make an order referring disputes to the arbitrator
- 2 Whether an award can be set aside on the ground of invalidity of reference under section 30(c) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, and if 'otherwise invalid' includes invalid reference
Ratio Decidendi
The court, after appointing an arbitrator under section 8(2) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, becomes functus officio and has no jurisdiction to refer disputes to the arbitrator; any such reference is without authority and any award made on such an invalid reference is a nullity and can be set aside as 'otherwise invalid' under section 30(c) of the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Awards challenged are set aside as nullities
- One set of hearing fee; costs awarded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment