UNION OF INDIA & ANR. versus SMT. SHANTI DEVI ETC. ETC.
The proper multiplier for determining compensation for land acquired in 1962-63 under the capitalisation principle is fifteen years’ purchase, not twenty years’ purchase; as the lands were agricultural without special potential, compensation must be reduced accordingly.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India; Appellant: State of Himachal Pradesh; Respondent: Smt. Shanti Devi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation Determination, Valuation of Acquired Land, Capitalisation Principle, Multiplier for Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Appellant
State of Himachal Pradesh
Appellant
Smt. Shanti Devi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate multiplier to be adopted for compensation determination in land acquired in 1962-63 based on capitalisation principle?
- 2 Whether the District Court and High Court erred in applying twenty years' purchase rule instead of the correct multiplier
Ratio Decidendi
The proper multiplier for determining compensation for land acquired in 1962-63 under the capitalisation principle is fifteen years’ purchase, not twenty years’ purchase; as the lands were agricultural without special potential, compensation must be reduced accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeals partly allowed
Orders
- Compensation for land of the best category reduced from Rs. 1,000 per kanal to Rs. 750 per kanal by applying fifteen years' purchase rule instead of twenty.
- Similarly, compensation for other categories of land to be reduced by one-fourth from original amounts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment