UNION OF INDIA versus TARIT RANJAN DAS
The respondent failed to prove parity in work, duties, and responsibilities between Stenographers in subordinate offices and those in the Central Secretariat, as required by law and explained in relevant precedents. The Fifth Central Pay Commission specifically considered and rejected equivalence. The Tribunal exceeded its review jurisdiction by acting as if it were an appellate authority.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India; Respondent: Tarit Ranjan Das
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Orders of Central Administrative Tribunal and Guwahati High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay for Equal Work, Pay Commission Recommendations, Scope of Review, Parity in Pay Scales
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Appellant
Tarit Ranjan Das
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Orders of Central Administrative Tribunal and Guwahati High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent is entitled to parity in pay scale with Stenographer Grade C of Central Secretariat under 'equal pay for equal work'
- 2 What is the scope of review before Tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to prove parity in work, duties, and responsibilities between Stenographers in subordinate offices and those in the Central Secretariat, as required by law and explained in relevant precedents. The Fifth Central Pay Commission specifically considered and rejected equivalence. The Tribunal exceeded its review jurisdiction by acting as if it were an appellate authority.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of Tribunal in review application and of the High Court confirming it are set aside.
- Cost made easy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment