UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus VICCO LABORATORIES

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus VICCO LABORATORIES

The 2005 show cause notice was quashed because it was a mere repetition of earlier notices seeking to re-open an issue already finally concluded by judgments of the Bombay High Court and this Court; issuance of such a notice in those circumstances was an abuse of process and beyond the authorities' jurisdiction, and the writ court was justified in interfering notwithstanding the general rule against intervention at the show cause stage.

Parties
Appellant: Union of India; Respondent: Vicco Laboratories
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
26 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal No. 5401 of 2007 / On Appeal From the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench (w.p. No. 2913/2005) by Order Dated 7.10.2006
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Classification of Goods, Show Cause Notice, Abuse of Process, Finality of Litigation, Writ Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Union of India

Appellant

Vicco Laboratories

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal No. 5401 of 2007 / On Appeal From the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench (w.p. No. 2913/2005) by Order Dated 7.10.2006

  1. 1 Whether the writ court should interfere at the stage of issuance of a show cause notice
  2. 2 Whether the 29.04.2005 show cause notice was an attempt to re-open issues finally concluded by earlier High Court and Supreme Court judgments and therefore an abuse of process
  3. 3 Whether the authorities had jurisdiction to issue the impugned show cause notice in view of earlier final decisions

Ratio Decidendi

The 2005 show cause notice was quashed because it was a mere repetition of earlier notices seeking to re-open an issue already finally concluded by judgments of the Bombay High Court and this Court; issuance of such a notice in those circumstances was an abuse of process and beyond the authorities' jurisdiction, and the writ court was justified in interfering notwithstanding the general rule against intervention at the show cause stage.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Impugned show cause notice dated 29.04.2005 quashed
  • Appeal dismissed