UNION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus GAURAV DWIVEDI AND ORS .
When vacancies are finally determined before interviews, the number of candidates called for interview should reflect twice the number of the revised vacancies and not the original notified vacancies. There is no prejudice caused to candidates due to this reduction, nor is the UPSC bound to complete the process on the basis of the original number notified.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of Public Service Commission; Respondents: Gaura V Dwivedi and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Allahabad High Court in W.p.no. 647 of 1999
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Civil Services Examination, Recruitment Procedure, Shortlisting for Interview, Change in Number of Vacancies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of Public Service Commission
Appellant
Gaura V Dwivedi and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Allahabad High Court in W.p.no. 647 of 1999
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the UPSC is required to call double the originally notified vacancies for interview or double the finally determined vacancies.
- 2 Whether the change in the number of vacancies during the examination prejudices candidates.
Ratio Decidendi
When vacancies are finally determined before interviews, the number of candidates called for interview should reflect twice the number of the revised vacancies and not the original notified vacancies. There is no prejudice caused to candidates due to this reduction, nor is the UPSC bound to complete the process on the basis of the original number notified.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order of the Allahabad High Court dated 29th April, 1999 is set aside.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment