UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus GIRISHJAYANTILAL VAGHELA AND ORS
A person appointed purely on contract for a short term outside the recruitment rules, without public advertisement or the authorized selection process, does not become a Government servant and is not entitled to relaxation of upper age limit reserved for Government servants; such benefits apply only to regular Government servants appointed according to statutory rules.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union Public Service Commission; Respondent No. 1: Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela; Respondent No. 4: Naresh Sharma
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court: Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 13.12.2002 of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 1918 of 2002
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment and order of the High Court set aside; writ petition by respondent dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Relaxation of Upper Age Limit in Recruitment, Contractual Appointment Vs. Government Servant Status, Recruitment Rules, Equality of Opportunity in Public Employment (article 16)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union Public Service Commission
Appellant
Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela
Respondent No. 1
Naresh Sharma
Respondent No. 4
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court: Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 13.12.2002 of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 1918 of 2002
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a person appointed on a short-term contract basis de hors recruitment rules is entitled to relaxation of upper age limit for Government servants under recruitment rules.
- 2 Whether such a contractual appointee acquires the status of 'Government servant' for the purpose of service benefits.
Ratio Decidendi
A person appointed purely on contract for a short term outside the recruitment rules, without public advertisement or the authorized selection process, does not become a Government servant and is not entitled to relaxation of upper age limit reserved for Government servants; such benefits apply only to regular Government servants appointed according to statutory rules.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment and order of the High Court set aside; writ petition by respondent dismissed.
Orders
- The judgment and order dated 13.12.2002 of the Bombay High Court is set aside.
- The writ petition filed by respondent No. 1 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment