UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., SHIMLA versus TILAK SINGH AND ORS.
A statutory insurance policy under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 does not cover the risk of death or injury to a gratuitous passenger (such as a pillion rider on a scooter) unless there is a specific endorsement in the policy and an additional premium has been paid. Hence, the insurer owed no liability towards the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Shimla; Respondent No. 1: Tilak Singh; Respondents 2 to 4: Legal heirs of Rajinder Singh (wife and minor daughters); Respondent No. 5: Bal Krishan; Respondents' Counsel: V.C. Mahajan, Sarwa Mitter, Mrs. S. Gupta, Amit Gupta for M/s. Mitter and Mitter Co., Mohan Pandey, Mrs. Rachna Gupta
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Liability of Insurer, Gratuitous Passenger Coverage, Transfer of Insurance Policy, Third Party Claims
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Shimla
Appellant
Tilak Singh
Respondent No. 1
Legal heirs of Rajinder Singh (wife and minor daughters)
Respondents 2 to 4
Bal Krishan
Respondent No. 5
V.C. Mahajan, Sarwa Mitter, Mrs. S. Gupta, Amit Gupta for M/s. Mitter and Mitter Co., Mohan Pandey, Mrs. Rachna Gupta
Respondents' Counsel
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a statutory insurance policy under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 covers the risk of death or injury to a gratuitous passenger (pillion rider) in a private vehicle.
- 2 Effect of failure to notify insurer about transfer of insurance policy on third party liability.
Ratio Decidendi
A statutory insurance policy under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 does not cover the risk of death or injury to a gratuitous passenger (such as a pillion rider on a scooter) unless there is a specific endorsement in the policy and an additional premium has been paid. Hence, the insurer owed no liability towards the deceased. The transferor's failure to notify the insurer of the transfer does not affect liability towards third parties but is not relevant where the deceased is not a third party.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside; the appellant-insurance company is not liable to pay the compensation awarded to the claimants.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment