UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus A.N. SAXENA

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus A.N. SAXENA

A stay of disciplinary proceedings at an interim stage without careful consideration is improper, especially where charges are serious and misconduct is alleged; disciplinary proceedings against officers performing quasi-judicial functions are permissible with caution where culpability or improper motive is indicated.

Parties
Appellant: U.O.I.; Respondent: A.N. Saxena
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
27 March 1992
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Interim Orders of Central Administrative Tribunal
Outcome
Appeals allowed
Legal Topics
Disciplinary Proceedings, Judicial/quasi Judicial Functions, Interim Relief, Pension Payments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

U.O.I.

Appellant

A.N. Saxena

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Interim Orders of Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether disciplinary proceedings against an Income Tax Officer performing quasi-judicial functions can be stayed at interim stage.
  2. 2 Whether disciplinary proceedings can be initiated for actions performed in discharge of judicial or quasi-judicial functions.
  3. 3 Propriety of voluntary retirement during pendency of disciplinary enquiry.

Ratio Decidendi

A stay of disciplinary proceedings at an interim stage without careful consideration is improper, especially where charges are serious and misconduct is alleged; disciplinary proceedings against officers performing quasi-judicial functions are permissible with caution where culpability or improper motive is indicated.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed

Orders

  • Impugned order of the Tribunal staying disciplinary proceedings set aside.
  • Disciplinary proceedings against respondent to proceed according to law.