U. P. JAL NIGAM AND ANR. versus SYED KHADIM WARIS
Order of compulsory retirement based on an adverse entry against which representation was pending and another uncommunicated entry cannot be sustained. Proper procedure requires communication of all relevant adverse entries and consideration of representation before passing such order.
- Parties
- Appellant: U.P. Jal Nigam; Respondent: Syed Khadim Waris
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Allahabad High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; impugned High Court order set aside; matter restored to pre-compulsory retirement stage
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Retirement, Adverse Entries in Service Record, Representation Against Adverse Entry
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
U.P. Jal Nigam
Appellant
Syed Khadim Waris
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Allahabad High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order of compulsory retirement was valid when based on an adverse entry against which representation was pending and another uncommunicated adverse entry
Ratio Decidendi
Order of compulsory retirement based on an adverse entry against which representation was pending and another uncommunicated entry cannot be sustained. Proper procedure requires communication of all relevant adverse entries and consideration of representation before passing such order.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; impugned High Court order set aside; matter restored to pre-compulsory retirement stage
Orders
- Nigam to communicate 1984-85 adverse entry to respondent and seek time-bound representation
- Department to pass fresh order of compulsory retirement based on entire service record after considering representation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment