U. P. STATE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. versus I.B. MISRA AND ORS.
Rule 19 does not permit promotion as a method of appointment to Class I posts, including General Manager. Only selection or deputation are allowed modes under Rule 19. High Court's interpretation introducing promotion is impermissible.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: U.P. State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.; Respondent: I.B. Misra
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgments Dated 24.3.94 and 13.5.94
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; writ petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Recruitment Rules, Promotion Vs Selection/deputation, Appointment to Class I Posts
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
U.P. State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.
Appellant
I.B. Misra
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgments Dated 24.3.94 and 13.5.94
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Rule 19 of U.P. State Tourism Development Corporation Rules, 1981 permits promotion as a mode of appointment to Class I posts, specifically the post of General Manager
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 19 does not permit promotion as a method of appointment to Class I posts, including General Manager. Only selection or deputation are allowed modes under Rule 19. High Court's interpretation introducing promotion is impermissible.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; writ petition dismissed
Orders
- Judgment dated March 24, 1994 and order dated May 13, 1994 passed by High Court set aside
- Writ Petition filed by respondent dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment