U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. versus GURCHARAN SINGH & ANR.
The re-fixation of pay was justified under Order 4 of the Central Civil Services (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986 and as per the option exercised by the respondent. Service rendered to the Indian Army could not be taken into account since pension and other retirement benefits were already received and not deducted from salary, making the earlier pay fixation erroneous.
- Parties
- Appellant: U.T. Chandigarh & Ors.; Respondent: Gurcharan Singh & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Pay Fixation, Re Employed Pensioners, Ex Servicemen Quota, Central Civil Services (fixation of Pay of Re Employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
U.T. Chandigarh & Ors.
Appellant
Gurcharan Singh & Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the re-fixation of pay of re-employed ex-serviceman was correct under relevant orders
- 2 Whether previous service in Indian Army should be considered for pay fixation on re-employment
Ratio Decidendi
The re-fixation of pay was justified under Order 4 of the Central Civil Services (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986 and as per the option exercised by the respondent. Service rendered to the Indian Army could not be taken into account since pension and other retirement benefits were already received and not deducted from salary, making the earlier pay fixation erroneous.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- High Court order quashed and set aside
- Order of Central Administrative Tribunal restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment