V. K. GIRIJA V. RESHMA PARAYIL & ORS. versus RESHMA PARAYIL & ORS.
Chapter XXXII of Kerala Education Rules, 1959 is the prevailing statutory scheme for appointment in aided Higher Secondary Schools. Rule 4(2) requires vacancies for Higher Secondary School Teacher to be filled first by transfer. Rule 5(3) of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958 does not apply. Division Bench correctly directed appointment by transfer.
- Parties
- Appellant: V. K. Girija; Respondent No. 1: Reshma Parayil; Respondents: Other respondents
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment After Appeal Against Kerala High Court Division Bench
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Higher Secondary School Teacher, Direct Recruitment Vs. Transfer, Kerala Education Rules, 1959, Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
V. K. Girija
Appellant
Reshma Parayil
Respondent No. 1
Other respondents
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment After Appeal Against Kerala High Court Division Bench
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appointment to the post of Higher Secondary School Teacher should be by transfer or direct recruitment
- 2 Whether Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958 or Kerala Education Rules, 1959 govern the appointment
Ratio Decidendi
Chapter XXXII of Kerala Education Rules, 1959 is the prevailing statutory scheme for appointment in aided Higher Secondary Schools. Rule 4(2) requires vacancies for Higher Secondary School Teacher to be filled first by transfer. Rule 5(3) of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958 does not apply. Division Bench correctly directed appointment by transfer.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Management is directed to appoint respondent No. 1 as Higher Secondary School Teacher (Economics) on or before 31.12.2018 so she may join on 01.01.2019.
- Appellant may be adjusted on the post currently held by respondent No. 1 from the same date, if willing. If not, respondents may proceed in accordance with law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment