V.M SYED MOHAMMAD AND COMPANY versus THE STTE OF ANDHRA.
The Madras General Sales Tax Act (IX of 1939) is not ultra vires the Government of India Act, 1935, as entry 48 in List II of the Seventh Schedule was wide enough to cover a law imposing a tax on purchasers as well as sellers; the Act does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution as there is no material suggesting arbitrary discrimination; Rule 16(5) is ultra vires section 5(vi) but severable, and does not affect the validity of the Act or other rules.
- Parties
- Appellant: V. M. Syed Mohammad and Company; Respondent: State of Andhra; Intervener: State of Madras; Intervener: State of Travancore-Cochin; Intervener: State of Mysore; Intervener: State of Bihar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 1954
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of High Court of Madras in Writ Petitions Nos. 21 and 41 of 1952
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Legislative Competency, Equality Before Law, Ultra Vires, Sales Tax, Rule Making Power
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
V. M. Syed Mohammad and Company
Appellant
State of Andhra
Respondent
State of Madras
Intervener
State of Travancore-Cochin
Intervener
State of Mysore
Intervener
State of Bihar
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of High Court of Madras in Writ Petitions Nos. 21 and 41 of 1952
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Madras General Sales Tax Act (IX of 1939) is ultra vires the Government of India Act, 1935 or the Constitution of India
- 2 Whether Rule 16(5) framed under the Act is ultra vires section 5(vi) of the Act
- 3 Whether the Act violates Article 14 of the Constitution by discriminating between purchasers of different commodities
Ratio Decidendi
The Madras General Sales Tax Act (IX of 1939) is not ultra vires the Government of India Act, 1935, as entry 48 in List II of the Seventh Schedule was wide enough to cover a law imposing a tax on purchasers as well as sellers; the Act does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution as there is no material suggesting arbitrary discrimination; Rule 16(5) is ultra vires section 5(vi) but severable, and does not affect the validity of the Act or other rules.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Rule 16(5) is ultra vires section 5(vi) but is severable and does not affect the validity of other rules.
- Agent for the respondent and for the interveners: States of Madras, Mysore and Bihar: R. H. Dhebar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment