R. MANJULA versus V. RAJA

R. MANJULA versus V. RAJA

Because the parties have resolved their differences and consented, via joint compromise memo, to live together, the further continuance of matrimonial proceedings is unnecessary and the transfer petition is disposed.

Parties
Petitioner: R. Manjula; Respondent: V. Raja
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 January 2009
Procedural Posture
Transfer Petition (civil) / Disposition After Settlement
Outcome
Transfer petition disposed of in view of settlement; proceedings in H.M.P. No.289 of 2005 stand closed.
Legal Topics
Transfer of Matrimonial Proceedings, Mediation, Compromise Memo
Family Law Transfer of Matrimonial Proceedings Mediation Compromise Memo

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R. Manjula

Petitioner

V. Raja

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Transfer Petition (civil) / Disposition After Settlement

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the matrimonial case pending in Nasik should be transferred to Vellore at the request of the wife.
  2. 2 Whether settlement through mediation may render the transfer petition infructuous.

Ratio Decidendi

Because the parties have resolved their differences and consented, via joint compromise memo, to live together, the further continuance of matrimonial proceedings is unnecessary and the transfer petition is disposed.

Court Disposition

Transfer petition disposed of in view of settlement; proceedings in H.M.P. No.289 of 2005 stand closed.

Orders

  • Further continuance of H.M.P. No.289 of 2005 not necessary.
  • The proceedings stand closed.