V. S. RAHI AND ANR. versus SMT. RAM CHAMBELI
The respondent landlady was not entitled to recover possession under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act as she had obtained permission by making wrong statements, and such suppression of facts disentitles her from invoking the remedy under that section.
- Parties
- Appellant: V. S. Rahi; Respondent: Smt. Ram Chambeli
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 January 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Delhi High Court Judgment Dated August 23, 1982 in S.a.o. No. 277 of 1982
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Delhi Rent Control Act Section 21, Suppression of Facts, Collusion, Rule of Oppression, Illegal Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
V. S. Rahi
Appellant
Smt. Ram Chambeli
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Delhi High Court Judgment Dated August 23, 1982 in S.a.o. No. 277 of 1982
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was entitled to eviction under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act after obtaining permission based on false statements
- 2 Whether collusion between parties vitiates the transaction under Section 21
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent landlady was not entitled to recover possession under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act as she had obtained permission by making wrong statements, and such suppression of facts disentitles her from invoking the remedy under that section.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgments of the High Court and Rent Control Tribunal set aside
- Application filed by the respondent under Section 21 of the Act for recovery of the premises dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment