AGRA DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION versus ANIL DAVID AND ORS.
Section 7(iv-A) of the U.P. Court Fees Act, 1870 deems market value for immovable property to be computed under sub-sections (v), (v-A) or (v-B); where the plaintiff or predecessor-in-title was not a party to the instrument the court-fee valuation is one-fifth of that value; the plaintiff is not obliged at the filing stage to prove the land is revenue-paying and the correct market value based on revenue payable is a question to be tried in the suit; the High Court's reliance on circle rate as conclusively determinative was not sustainable on the facts.
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: AGRA DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION; Respondents/defendants: ANIL DAVID AND ORS.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Valuation for Court Fee, Cancellation of Instrument, Market Value Determination, Suit Valuation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AGRA DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION
Appellant/plaintiff
ANIL DAVID AND ORS.
Respondents/defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suits were undervalued and the court fee paid was insufficient
- 2 Whether market value for court fee is to be determined by the circle rate fixed by the Collector or by computation under Section 7(v), (v-A) or (v-B) of the U.P. Court Fees Act, 1870
- 3 Whether a plaintiff who is not party to the instrument must prove at the stage of filing that the land is revenue-paying and the details of such revenue
Ratio Decidendi
Section 7(iv-A) of the U.P. Court Fees Act, 1870 deems market value for immovable property to be computed under sub-sections (v), (v-A) or (v-B); where the plaintiff or predecessor-in-title was not a party to the instrument the court-fee valuation is one-fifth of that value; the plaintiff is not obliged at the filing stage to prove the land is revenue-paying and the correct market value based on revenue payable is a question to be tried in the suit; the High Court's reliance on circle rate as conclusively determinative was not sustainable on the facts.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment of the High Court and the trial court's findings on valuation court-fee are set aside to the extent indicated
- The question of what is the market value based on the revenue payable shall be tried in the suit
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment