MADHU LIMAYE AND ANR. versus VED MURTI & ORS.
Since both the counsel and several members of the Bench could not follow arguments in Hindi, and the intervener was not agreeable to alternatives, intervention must be cancelled as the language of the court is English.
- Parties
- Petitioner: MAOHU LIMA YE; Respondent: Ved Murti; Petitioner: Pratap Singh; Respondent: C. D. Daphtary; Respondent: L. M. Singhvi; Respondent: O. P. Rana; Respondent: Niren De; Respondent: R. H. Dhebar; Respondent: H. R. Khanna; Respondent: S. P. Nayar; Respondent: R. N. Sachthey; Intervener: S. C. Agarwal; Intervener's Counsel: D. P. Singh; Intervener: Raj Narain
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 1970
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition / Original Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- intervention cancelled
- Legal Topics
- Language of the Supreme Court, Intervener's Rights, Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MAOHU LIMA YE
Petitioner
Ved Murti
Respondent
Pratap Singh
Petitioner
C. D. Daphtary
Respondent
L. M. Singhvi
Respondent
O. P. Rana
Respondent
Niren De
Respondent
R. H. Dhebar
Respondent
H. R. Khanna
Respondent
S. P. Nayar
Respondent
R. N. Sachthey
Respondent
S. C. Agarwal
Intervener
D. P. Singh
Intervener's Counsel
Raj Narain
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Original Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an intervener may argue before the Supreme Court of India in Hindi when the court's language is English.
Ratio Decidendi
Since both the counsel and several members of the Bench could not follow arguments in Hindi, and the intervener was not agreeable to alternatives, intervention must be cancelled as the language of the court is English.
Court Disposition
intervention cancelled
Orders
- Intervener's arguments in Hindi not permitted; only alternative is to cancel intervention.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment