VIDYACHARAN SHUKLA versus KHUBCHAND BAGHEL AND OTHERS
Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1908, applies to appeals to the High Court under s. 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, for the purpose of computing limitation, as the Representation of the People Act does not expressly exclude its operation. Thus, time taken for obtaining a copy of the Tribunal's order is deductible, and the appeal in the present case was within limitation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Vidyacharan Shukla; Respondents: Khubchand Baghel and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in 1st Appeal No. 23 of 1963
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Computation of Limitation Period, Exclusion of Time in Calculation of Limitation, Appeal Under Representation of the People Act, 1951, Interpretation of Limitation Act Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vidyacharan Shukla
Appellant
Khubchand Baghel and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in 1st Appeal No. 23 of 1963
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether in computing the period of limitation for filing an appeal to the High Court under s. 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the time for obtaining a copy of the order can be excluded under s. 12 of the Limitation Act, 1908.
- 2 Whether s. 29(2)(a) of the Limitation Act applied to cases of appeals preferred under s. 116-A.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1908, applies to appeals to the High Court under s. 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, for the purpose of computing limitation, as the Representation of the People Act does not expressly exclude its operation. Thus, time taken for obtaining a copy of the Tribunal's order is deductible, and the appeal in the present case was within limitation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs as proposed by the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment