VIJAY SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Order of dismissal is set aside due to violation of mandatory requirement under Rule 15(2) of the Delhi Police (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1980 for obtaining prior approval of the Additional Commissioner of Police before conducting departmental enquiry.
- Parties
- Appellant: Vijay Singh; Respondents: Union of India and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Delhi High Court Final Order Dated 9.7.2003 in C.w. No. 4220/2003
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Order of dismissal set aside. Appellant to be reinstated. No costs.
- Legal Topics
- Departmental Enquiry, Dismissal From Service, Delhi Police (punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1980, Rule 15(2) Mandatory Approval Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vijay Singh
Appellant
Union of India and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Delhi High Court Final Order Dated 9.7.2003 in C.w. No. 4220/2003
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prior approval of the Additional Commissioner of Police under Rule 15(2) of the Delhi Police (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1980 is mandatory for departmental enquiry
- 2 Whether the appellant's dismissal was vitiated due to violation of mandatory provisions
Ratio Decidendi
Order of dismissal is set aside due to violation of mandatory requirement under Rule 15(2) of the Delhi Police (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1980 for obtaining prior approval of the Additional Commissioner of Police before conducting departmental enquiry.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Order of dismissal set aside. Appellant to be reinstated. No costs.
Orders
- Appellant reinstated forthwith.
- No back wages from 21.1.1998 till reinstatement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment