VIKASH KUMAR versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.
The Supreme Court held that benchmark disability under s.2(r) is not a precondition for entitlement to reasonable accommodation under the RPwD Act, 2016; a person falling within s.2(s) whose disability (e.g. writer's cramp) operates as a barrier to writing is entitled to a scribe and related accommodations, and DoPT/UPSC erred in restricting scribes only to benchmark categories; appellant entitled to scribe and MSJE directed to frame comprehensive guidelines for granting scribes to persons under s.2(s).
- Parties
- Appellant: VIKASH KUMAR; Respondent: UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION; Respondent: UNION OF INDIA
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Decided on Appeal by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court judgment and Tribunal order set aside
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Accommodation, Benchmark Disability, Scribe Entitlement in Examinations, Interpretation of Rpw D Act 2016, Right to Equality Under Articles 14, 19, 21
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
VIKASH KUMAR
Appellant
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decided on Appeal by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a candidate suffering from writer's cramp/dysgraphia who does not meet the 40% benchmark disability threshold is entitled to a scribe for the Civil Services Examination
- 2 Whether the concept of 'benchmark disability' in s.2(r) of the RPwD Act, 2016 is a precondition for entitlement to reasonable accommodations such as a scribe
- 3 Whether DoPT/UPSC may limit provision of scribes to only those with benchmark disabilities contrary to the RPwD Act, 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that benchmark disability under s.2(r) is not a precondition for entitlement to reasonable accommodation under the RPwD Act, 2016; a person falling within s.2(s) whose disability (e.g. writer's cramp) operates as a barrier to writing is entitled to a scribe and related accommodations, and DoPT/UPSC erred in restricting scribes only to benchmark categories; appellant entitled to scribe and MSJE directed to frame comprehensive guidelines for granting scribes to persons under s.2(s).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment and Tribunal order set aside
Orders
- Appeal allowed and impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi dated 25.09.2018 set aside
- Appellant entitled to facility of a scribe for the Civil Services Examination and any other competitive selection conducted under authority of the government
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment