VIKRAMJLT SINGH@ VICKY versus STATE OF PUNJAB
The prosecution failed to establish a chain of circumstances pointing conclusively to the guilt of the accused, and the circumstances forming the basis of conviction were not put to the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C.; grave suspicion cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt; therefore, the conviction and death sentence cannot be sustained.
- Parties
- Appellant: Vikramjit Singh @ Vicky; Respondent: State of Punjab
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Affirming Conviction and Death Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Circumstantial Evidence, Section 313 Cr.p.c. Examination, Death Penalty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vikramjit Singh @ Vicky
Appellant
State of Punjab
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Affirming Conviction and Death Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the circumstances relied on by the prosecution and the High Court establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt
- 2 Whether the death sentence imposed was justified in law given the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution failed to establish a chain of circumstances pointing conclusively to the guilt of the accused, and the circumstances forming the basis of conviction were not put to the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C.; grave suspicion cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt; therefore, the conviction and death sentence cannot be sustained.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside
Orders
- Appellant directed to be released unless wanted in any other case
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment