VINOD KUMAR versus THE COMMISSIONER AND ORS.
The relevant date for determination of ceiling area under Section 29 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, in cases where right is acquired by virtue of a decree or order, is the date of such decree or order. Here, respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 became tenure-holders only on and from Supreme Court judgment dated 23.11.1989, so ceiling calculation must be with reference to that date, not the Act's commencement.
- Parties
- Appellant: Vinod Kumar; Respondents: The Commissioner and Ors.; Respondent: Meerut Development Authority; Respondent No. 3: Yashvir Singh; Respondent No. 4: Satvir Singh; Respondent No. 5: Jagdishpal Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Allahabad High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings, Ceiling Area Determination, Tenure Holder Rights, Title and Possession After Court Decree
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vinod Kumar
Appellant
The Commissioner and Ors.
Respondents
Meerut Development Authority
Respondent
Yashvir Singh
Respondent No. 3
Satvir Singh
Respondent No. 4
Jagdishpal Singh
Respondent No. 5
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Allahabad High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the relevant date for re-determination of ceiling area under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 when right is acquired by virtue of a Supreme Court judgment?
- 2 Whether the rights acquired by respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 over 64 bighas of land should be determined with reference to the date of Supreme Court judgment or the commencement of the Ceiling Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The relevant date for determination of ceiling area under Section 29 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, in cases where right is acquired by virtue of a decree or order, is the date of such decree or order. Here, respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 became tenure-holders only on and from Supreme Court judgment dated 23.11.1989, so ceiling calculation must be with reference to that date, not the Act's commencement.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Land allotted to Meerut Development Authority and other allottees must be returned to respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5.
- High Court orders upheld; no reason to interfere.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment