VISMAY DIGAMBAR THAKARE versus RAMCHANDRA SAMAJ SEWA SAMITI AND ORS.
Appeal disposed of in terms of an amicable settlement, with appellant to be paid Rupees one lakh towards back wages, jointly and severally by respondent No.1 Samiti and respondent No.2 Institution, in full and final settlement of claim.
- Parties
- Appellant: Vismay Digambar Thakare; Respondent No.1: Ramchandra Samaj Sewa Samiti; Respondent No.2: Institution (unnamed, respondent No.2)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Disposition After High Court Review
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Back Wages, Amicable Settlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vismay Digambar Thakare
Appellant
Ramchandra Samaj Sewa Samiti
Respondent No.1
Institution (unnamed, respondent No.2)
Respondent No.2
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition After High Court Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant is entitled to back wages after High Court set aside School Tribunal's award
- 2 Whether assertion of not being gainfully employed is necessary for award of back wages
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal disposed of in terms of an amicable settlement, with appellant to be paid Rupees one lakh towards back wages, jointly and severally by respondent No.1 Samiti and respondent No.2 Institution, in full and final settlement of claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Appellant to be paid by respondent No.1 Samiti and respondent No.2 Institution jointly and severally a sum of Rupees one lakh towards back wages in full and final settlement of the claim
- Payment to be made within three months; failing which, amount shall earn interest at 10% per annum from date of judgment till actual payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment