VISVESWARAN versus STATE REP. BY S.D.M.

VISVESWARAN versus STATE REP. BY S.D.M.

Conviction may be sustained on the basis of circumstantial evidence where identification parade was not conducted and the accused was not identified in court, provided the circumstances establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Parties
Appellant: Visveswaran; Respondent: State Rep. by S.D.M.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
28 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Legal Topics
Rape, Wrongful Confinement, Abduction, Identification of Accused, Defective Investigation, Evidence Appreciation
Criminal Law Rape Wrongful Confinement Abduction Identification of Accused Defective Investigation Evidence Appreciation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Visveswaran

Appellant

State Rep. by S.D.M.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether conviction can be sustained despite failure to identify accused in court and non-holding of test identification parade
  2. 2 Whether defective investigation and absence of certain evidence are fatal to conviction in rape cases

Ratio Decidendi

Conviction may be sustained on the basis of circumstantial evidence where identification parade was not conducted and the accused was not identified in court, provided the circumstances establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed.