MD. ALIMUDDIN versus WAIZUDDIN AND ANR.

Courts below rightly exercised discretion to extend time, as respondents complied with original decree and extension; no illegality in exercise of power.

Parties: Petitioner: MD. Alimuddin; Respondent: W Aizuddin; Respondent: ANR.
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 19 February 1997
Procedural Posture: Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Supreme Court Order
Outcome: Petition dismissed
Legal Topics: Specific Relief, Extension of Time in Decree, Rescission of Contract

Civil Law Specific Relief Extension of Time in Decree Rescission of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

MD. Alimuddin

Petitioner

W Aizuddin

Respondent

ANR.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Supreme Court Order

Legal Issues

1 Whether the courts below rightly exercised discretion in extending time for compliance with decree for specific performance
2 Whether the contract should be rescinded under Section 28(1) of the Specific Relief Act

Ratio Decidendi

Courts below rightly exercised discretion to extend time, as respondents complied with original decree and extension; no illegality in exercise of power.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

Special Leave Petition dismissed
No illegality in exercise of discretion by lower courts