WYETH LIMITED & ORS. versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

WYETH LIMITED & ORS. versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

The complaint, when carefully read, disclosed only a commercial relationship that had broken down and did not establish the ingredients of the offences alleged; accordingly the FIR and the charge-sheet arising from that complaint were liable to be quashed and the High Court erred in dismissing the quash petition without considering the subsequent filing of the charge-sheet and the application to bring it on record.

Parties
Appellant: WYETH LIMITED & ORS.; Respondent: STATE OF BIHAR; Complainant/respondent: Respondent No.2
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
11 August 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order Dismissing Petition Under Section 482 Cr.p.c.
Outcome
Appeal allowed; impugned High Court order set aside.
Legal Topics
Quashing of Fir/complaint, Private Complaint Under Section 200 Cr.p.c., Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.p.c., Charge Sheet, Ingredients of Offence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WYETH LIMITED & ORS.

Appellant

STATE OF BIHAR

Respondent

Respondent No.2

Complainant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order Dismissing Petition Under Section 482 Cr.p.c.

  1. 1 Whether the private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. disclosed commission of any offence
  2. 2 Whether the FIR and subsequent charge-sheet ought to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
  3. 3 Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the quash petition without considering the subsequent filing of the charge-sheet and the interlocutory application to bring it on record

Ratio Decidendi

The complaint, when carefully read, disclosed only a commercial relationship that had broken down and did not establish the ingredients of the offences alleged; accordingly the FIR and the charge-sheet arising from that complaint were liable to be quashed and the High Court erred in dismissing the quash petition without considering the subsequent filing of the charge-sheet and the application to bring it on record.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; impugned High Court order set aside.

Orders

  • FIR and the charge-sheet against the appellants are quashed
  • No order as to costs