McCleary -v- McPhillips & ors [2015] IEHC 591 (31 July 2015)
The court held that, despite administrative errors and failures in notification, the appointments and discharge of the receivers were validly executed in accordance with the bank's internal authority and board resolutions. The core legal requirements for appointment and discharge were met. The agents' entry onto the forecourt did not amount to trespass. The confusion and errors did not invalidate the receivership or entitle Mr. McPhillips to damages or declarations sought.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 591
- Parties
- Plaintiff (2014/5970 P), Defendant (2014/5264 P): Paul McCleary; Defendant (2014/5970 P), Plaintiff (2014/5264 P): Paul McPhillips; Defendant (2014/5264 P): ACC Loan Management Ltd (formerly ACC Bank Plc); Defendant (2014/5264 P): Grant Thornton International Ltd t/a Grant Thornton Ireland; Defendant (2014/5264 P), First Receiver: Stephen Tennant; Defendant (2014/5264 P): Declan Kavanagh; Defendant (2014/5264 P): Jack McCann
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (possession and Appointment of Receiver) / High Court Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Claims by Mr. McPhillips dismissed; orders for possession and injunctions in favour of the receiver affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment and Discharge of Receivers, Validity of Deeds of Appointment/discharge, Mortgage Enforcement, Execution of Company Documents, Trespass, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul McCleary
Plaintiff (2014/5970 P), Defendant (2014/5264 P)
Paul McPhillips
Defendant (2014/5970 P), Plaintiff (2014/5264 P)
ACC Loan Management Ltd (formerly ACC Bank Plc)
Defendant (2014/5264 P)
Grant Thornton International Ltd t/a Grant Thornton Ireland
Defendant (2014/5264 P)
Stephen Tennant
Defendant (2014/5264 P), First Receiver
Declan Kavanagh
Defendant (2014/5264 P)
Jack McCann
Defendant (2014/5264 P)
Procedural Posture
Civil (possession and Appointment of Receiver) / High Court Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Stephen Tennant was validly appointed as first receiver
- 2 Whether the deed of discharge for Stephen Tennant was valid
- 3 Whether Paul McCleary was validly appointed as second receiver
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, despite administrative errors and failures in notification, the appointments and discharge of the receivers were validly executed in accordance with the bank's internal authority and board resolutions. The core legal requirements for appointment and discharge were met. The agents' entry onto the forecourt did not amount to trespass. The confusion and errors did not invalidate the receivership or entitle Mr. McPhillips to damages or declarations sought.
Court Disposition
Claims by Mr. McPhillips dismissed; orders for possession and injunctions in favour of the receiver affirmed.
Orders
- Order for possession of the property to the receiver
- Permanent injunction restraining Mr. McPhillips from interfering with the receiver
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment